Sabah and Sarawak:The Last Battlefield

Well,in my previous blog,I wrote about Permatang Pauh as the last battlefield for Pakatan Rakyat to triumph people's voice.

And then,we won that battle.Yet,we still not in triumph yet.

I'm one of millions people who may skeptical about Peaceful Coupe d'Etat planned by Datuk Seri Dr Anwar Ibrahim,it's not like I didn't believe him,but I don't believe "the system".

Meanwhile,Japanese PM Yasuo Fukada already leave the office after seeing opposition--out of his hands. Well,if Malaysian system is like Japan,or at least Singapore,I believe Anwar is now Prime Minister of Malaysia.

40 MP of Sabah and Sarawak voices their feelings to leave BN.

Gerakan voicing their concern about Ahmad Ismail(UMNO Bukit Bendera) 'racial slur',and considering to abandon ship.

Reports from examination of Saiful ass--no f*cking bleed.

Anyway,Abdullah Badawi should listen to this song,Radiohead-Creep(mp3).The chorous goes like this..So long...suckaaaa!!

I'm a creep

I'm a weirdo..

What the hell I'm doing here..

I don't belong here...

Let's Wave Sabah and Sarawak flag.

Malaysian Independence Day is 16 September.And without Sabah and Sarawak,there will be no Malaysia.So Najib,don't you ever say "Malaysians are overwhelmed accepting August 31st as National Day",because:-

1. There are no country named Malaysia on August 31st,1957.It was MALAYA.


2. They changed to MALAYSIA on SEPTEMBER 16th,1963.


3. When it was August 31st,1957,Sabah and Sarawak are still under Union Jack flag.They still sang God Save The Queen,not Negaraku.


4. There is no Sabah or Sarawak on August 31st,1957.It was NORTH BORNEO and NORTH KALIMANTAN.

Happy 45th Merdeka Day,Malaysia!13 days to go.

Meanwhile,keep wave Sabah and Sarawak flags high.

Happy Birthday Malaysia(oh,really?)

Every year Malaysians nationwide celebrates August 31st as their independence day.With sparkle fireworks,and marching army,with colorful girls and boy,doing tifoes(arranging coloring cards so that we saw words from far,like football fans used to doing it),and there's thousands of spectators watching as tanks,jet fighter and helicopters fly at the sky.

But is that really Malaysia independent on August 31st?Is that includes Sabah and Sarawak?If before this on my July post I'm saying about Sabah-Phillipines thingy,where is appriciation towards both states if we keep celebrating August 31st as Malaysian National Day?

One more question,"is that we really,really independent?"

Among my peers,I'm the first person who declared as "Malaysian history text book denier".I deny Malaysian history text book as early as I'm 15 years old,when I attempted PMR exams.I managed to score 8As of exams,but something bothers me.

If you Malaysians,really read your text book,i mean really focused on it,no bubble gums in your mouth or not reading it by listening your i-Pod,words by words,there will be a missing chapter.

1. What happen in between 1920s(where's those reformist from Al-Azhar such as newspaper of Al Imam etc) until World War II occured?In my slang,"period between Two World Wars"?


2. What happen in between,after World War II until UMNO existance in 1946?From August 1945 until May 1946?There must be some leaders from AMCJA,Fifth Column,Kesatuan Melayu Muda will mobilized political rally against re-conquer attempt by British.


3. What happen between UMNO existance in 1946 until so-called "Independence Day" on August 31st,1957?

Well,you wouldn't notice,don't you?Because most of us reading it because "the teacher said so".You've even not noticing a single gap because no one could ever told you,because even the teacher itself born after independence day.And the text book has been written by government,which is UMNO-BN.OK,if I be a government,I wouldn't tell my people that I always fart like a nuke bomb when I wake up in the morning(which I didn't) and I don't tell my people that I like biting nail despite there's a dirt there(which I didn't).I will tell my people that I was 100 metre school record holder(which I didn't),or I was the one who taking student's oath at morning assembly(which I didn't).I put it brief,THE GOVERNMENT won't tell it's bad to public.My question is,what happen in these missing gaps?

And then it goes like saying,"I've watched Hati Malaya-1957",hello,it's fictional,it's just a movie,or "Embun".Duh.Watch "10 Tahun Sebelum Merdeka(part 1)(part 2)(part 3)(part 4)".It's not a movie,it's DOCUMENTARY.

And finally Tunku Abdul Rahman shouted "Merdeka,Merdeka,Merdeka!" at Merdeka Stadium and hooraaay we merdeka.But you guys forget one thing,Malayan Emergency which occured between 1948 declared by British High Commissioner until 1960.Wait,is that we "merdeka" in 1957?Why British High Commissioner declaration still valid until 1960?And just after Malayan Emergency is over in July 31st,1960,on August 1st,1960,the act has been enacted under Article 149 Malaysian Constitutional,Internal Security Act,which will pre-emptively catching someone who SUSPECTED as threat of country(not UMNO).But we used to misquoted here,we used to think that UMNO=BN=NEGARA.Teettt!!You're wrong.So,are we "merdeka" yet?

Dear,we are not.

It's not political view,it's a fact.We still follows British rules,who proclaim us as merdeka?During 1963-1965 when Singapore is under Malaysia,Singaporean follows Malaysian rules.But after August 9th,1965,Singapore is under Singaporean rules.That's merdeka.

Meanwhile,keep waving our flags for this fake Independence Day.Happy Fake Independence Day Malaysia..

oppss..even the fake Independence Day are not correct.It's September 16,1963,where Sabah and Sarawak emerged with Malaysia.Before that,it was Malaya.So,if we celebrate August 31st as our Fake Independence Day,it's for Malaya,not Malaysia.

So,should I wait until September 16th?Double meaning,right?

Sabah,Phillipines.

The title of my blog today might be controversional for Malaysians.Some might will say,"is Ezreen Emira being retarded these days,counter the fact that Sabah were part of Malaysia?",some might saying "Ezreen become so delusional,and what the hack she attacked her own country for sake of immigrant Pinoys?"

I would like to say,the fact will always be hidden in Malaysians history textbook.What the truth actually never been told by Malaysian government to it's people,and forever,if someone not discovering the hidden truth,it shall remain forever.

Sabah:Rich of Resources,Most Undeveloped State in Malaysia.

Before I lay some facts here,I put some of details of State of Sabah.

Wide:76,115 km²
Population:3,387,000
Capital City:Kota Kinabalu
Density:32 people per 1 km²
Human Developement Index:0.729(medium)

Sabah natural resources such as petroleum,natural gas,timber,aluminum,palm oil,rubber.But this is a quote from Wikipedia that might (or not) surprising some of you.

Sabah ranked as one of the richest states in the federation, with a per capita GDP second only to Selangor (which then included Kuala Lumpur).However, despite its vast wealth of natural resources, Sabah is currently the poorest of Malaysia's states. Average incomes are now among the lowest in Malaysia, and with a considerably higher cost of living than in West Malaysia. In 2000, Sabah had an unemployment rate of 5.6 per cent - the highest of any Malaysian state and almost twice the national average of 3.1 per cent. The state has the highest poverty level in the country at 16 per cent, more than three times the national average.

But what is my point here?Giving Sabah back to Phillippines might not solving any problem,because according to some Malaysians,Pinoy's economy are not good as in Malaysia(who saying that?Media in Malaysia?),and plus with Mindanao war against Moro people,Sabah might be safe haven for those MILF terrorists.

What I'm trying to say is,is that we should going back to history.When Sulu Sultanate has been established in 1450,and when Brunei Sultan's were giving Sulu Sabah as dowry for marrying Sulu's princess in 1658,but in 1882,British North Borneo Company has leasing Sabah from Sulu,by Alfred Dent,which before that it was Baron von Overback,an Austro-Hungarian with his business partner Joseph William Torrey and Thomas Bradley Harris,both Americans.Alfred Dent were backing them with financial support,but von Overback was failed to convincing Vienna for funding his company.Alfred Dent then continue paying lease to Sulu and Brunei Sultanate,respectively.

And then it all went wrong here.In 1946,British which already won against Japanese occupation,has restored Crown Colony status towards Sabah,which they proclaimed as "colony of British Empire",before World War II occured.Actually it was British North Borneo has leasing Sabah from Sulu Sultanate.

And when Malaya reached independence on August 31st,1957,British realized that their empire which "never set the sun" are now rotting in history,so British are ready to let Sabah go.So,where should Sabah go?In 1963,when British were ready to let Sabah go,it was Malaya by Tunku,are asking for combine Peninsular of Malaya with Sabah and Sarawak,plus Singapore,merged as one country,Malaysia.Then,what happen to Sulu?Sulu has emerged with Phillippines,after independence in 1946.Shall be in 1946,British start paying lease to Phillippines.

In 1963,Phillippines joined Indonesia,rising "neo-colonialism" issue,with Indonesia even more radical,launching Konfrantasi against British-backed Malaysia.If before this I'm giving my back to my country Malaysia,now,I'm giving my back to the truth.Malaysia never owned Sabah and Sarawak.That's the fact.Malaysia is actually continuing British occupation towards Sabah and Sarawak,and that's a fact.

Malaysia is a continuation of British Empire legacy,and I still remember one of Tunku Abdul Rahman quotes why he insist to bring Sabah and Sarawak to be part of Malaysia,he told in his memoir by saying "Malaya has been colonised by London(United Kingdom),so it has similarities with system in Sabah,Sarawak,Singapore and Brunei.If we compared our history in Southeast Asia,Indo China has been colonised by Paris(France),Phillippines by Washington(USA),and Indonesia by Amsterdam(Dutch),so the reason for me to emerging Malaya with Sabah,Sarawak,Singapore and Brunei is to build a strong foundation,strong country,named Malaysia."

Now this is neo-colonialism words,don't you think?

Here's the British Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs letter for stating Sabah status.

p/s:My Pinoy friend told me,in Tagalog,Sandak means "lease" or gadai.So what is Sandakan stands for?

Fact:Mount Kinabalu are NOT the highest peak in Southeast Asia,it was 4th in Southeast Asia behind Hkakabo Razi(Myanmar) 5881 m,Puncak Jaya(Indonesia) 4884m,and Puncak Trikora(Indonesia)4750 m.Mount Kinabalu is 4101 m.Another BN propaganda towards you,Malaysians!

A January 7, 1883, letter from the British Secretary of State for Foreign
Affairs Lord Granville confirms the position that the “takeover” of the
British of Sabah, a Sulu property was a lease,
not a purchase.
It states: "The British Charter [representing the
British North Borneo Company] therefore differs essentially from the previous
Charters granted by the Crown... in the fact that the Crown in the present case
assumes no dominion or sovereignty over the
territories occupied by the Company, nor does it purport to grant to the Company powers of government
thereover; it merely conveys upon the persons associated the
status and incidents of a body corporate, and recognizes the grants of territory and the powers of government
made and delegated by the Sultan in whom the sovereignty remains
vested. It differs also from previous Charters in that it
prohibits instead of grants a general monopoly of trade.
"As regards the
general features of the undertaking, it is to be observed that the territories granted to the Company have been for
generations under the government of the Sultanate of Sulu and Brunei, with whom
Great Britain has had Treaties of Peace and Commerce."
In
retrospect, the British Foreign Affairs communique conceded that the matter of
sovereignty remained vested in the Sultan of Sulu and could not be delegated to
any party because the Deed of 1878 expressly prohibited it.